Thursday, May 23, 2013

Event Models for RESTful APIs

Event Models for RESTful APIs

Adding event-driven processing to REST APIs is an important concept for the emerging Internet of Things. REST APIs provide for high level system interoperability and software usability, while event driven processing is needed for autonomic capability and efficiency.

An event is a significant change in the state of some element of a system. Events are asynchronous, that is they occur at arbitrary times relative to other operations in the system.

REST APIs enable web scale resource interaction and simplify application programming. The state of the system and values of observable properties can be easily discovered and operated on using GET and SET operations in URI addressable end points that have memory-like semantics. Metadata can easily be added to functional data to enable linking resources into composite horizontal applications.

Event driven systems process real time data efficiently. These systems are often based on asynchronous messages sent between end points that invoke software at the end points. Application programming is generally more difficult because of the need to interact using a stateful communication protocol. One example is the difference between programming for sockets and messages (asynchronous) vs. memory-like read/write semantics (synchronous).

The Internet of Things needs to be an event driven system for efficient real time response and processing, and needs REST APIs for resource discovery and programming efficiency, and to support rich metadata for interoperability in horizontally integrated applications.

In the context of a REST API, an event occurs when a resource in the API is updated and/or it's value is changed, or changed significantly. Events can be any updates, or filtered updates that meet some criteria, for example temperature too high, temperature too low, or temperature changed by more than 2 degrees since the last update. Typically, Client-Server REST systems don't provide for asynchronous events, instead software would need to perform periodic GET operations to sample the state of a resource.

We propose to add event driven processing to REST by introducing a common set of patterns and abstractions that provide a well defined event model. The event model will enable asynchronous event processing and message oriented communications to be configured and controlled through the REST API. 

Many of these patterns and abstractions are familiar and in use today in various forms. For example, CoAP has support for both synchronous and asynchronous REST operations, there are message brokers with REST endpoints (Qest, Xively), and there are hooks for instrumenting RESTful endpoints to add callbacks on updates (Real Time REST hooks). This will summarize the fundamental patterns and build a complete event model based on these patterns.

REST endpoints as event sources

An event occurs when some resource is updated or changes. To support events in a REST architecture, there needs to be some means to detect and generate events when resources are updated, a means to propagate the events and direct them to the proper destination, for example to update another REST endpoint, and a means of acting on the event, by storing a record of the event or invoking event handler software to respond to the event.

The diagram above shows an example event processing graph:

(1) sensor data are updated when the sensor endpoint makes an observation and sends an update to the Smart Object Observable Property, which is a REST resource. 

(2) an Observer resource associated with the Observable Property informs the system to notice updates and forward them according to routing instructions contained in the Observer resource.

(3) The event is routed to the destination resource

(4) The Observable Property at the destination Smart Object is updated

(5) A handler is invoked based on an observer associated with the local resource. This updates a physical actuator endpoint.

HTTP provides for asynchronous operations from Client to Server using POST, PUT, or CREATE. By arranging to have a server endpoint at each resource location, as is the case in with the Smart Object API shown above, asynchronous updates can be propagated using standard HTTP protocol operations POST, PUT, and CREATE. 

Other protocols like MQTT can also be used to send events between resources. The Observer resource can program the topic, broker, service, QOS, etc. in it's stored representation. 

Using MQTT, the topic can be a representation of the URL and the data can be the representation of the data, e.g. JSON. This way, the URLs can be send between endpoints whilst tunneling through MQTT, preserving the semantics of REST updates and, more importantly, preserving the granular resource access control system based on capabilities that REST enables.

We will use MQTT as an example asynchronous protocol for this document, but we could also use HTTP POST, websockets, CoAP, XMPP, AMQP, Dbus, MODBUS, RS-232, WSNs, or any other asynchronous communication mechanism.

Observers and Subscribers in a general REST event model

The Observer is a graph resource that is associated with a data resource. The Observer informs and programs the system to generate events on updates of the associated resource. When the observed resource is updated, the system performs the actions specified by the Observer's graph end points, either propagating a representation of the resource update to another endpoint or invoking a handler. Graph endpoints can be added to describe the action, for example to specify the QOS of an MQTT publish operation.

This example above shows an Observer associated with a REST resource (Observable Property) that programs the endpoint to publish updates to a specified MQTT broker endpoint whenever the Observable Property is updated. The protocol, IP address, QOS, and topic are all specified as local graph relationships that the endpoint uses to program it's behavior when the Observer is created. 

Observers can use HTTP POST, websockets, XMPP, or any asynchronous event notification method available in the underlying platform.

The Subscriber is a graph resource associated with a destination resource endpoint which is to be updated. The Subscriber programs the destination endpoint to subscribe to a data source, such as a MQTT broker or a Smart Object Observable Property that uses HTTP POST. This creates a graph link from destination to source, and could be used to create an Observer resource at the source endpoint.

This example shows an MQTT subscriber that creates a subscription with a broker to publish updates to the associated REST resource (Observable Property). This creates a graph link back to the data source. This pattern can be used to control HTTP POST, CoAP extended GET, and other asynchronous notification mechanisms from the destination endpoint.

Note that Observers and Subscribers are ways of controlling asynchronous updates from either the source or the destination endpoints, or both. If both are used between 2 endpoints, there is a 2 way resource graph connection established.

Message broker with REST endpoints

Another set of abstractions is to enable the configuration and of existing message systems such as MQTT using REST endpoints. There are two interfaces, a message interface and a REST interface, to shared stored resources. 

There are two message operations supported, to enable  clients or brokers to publish updates to REST endpoints through a message interface, and to publish updates of REST endpoints to brokers or clients subscribing through a message interface. There is also a subscribe operation using the message interface. Incoming messages update resources, and resource updates send outgoing messages.

The convention is to use URIs as topics that allow the system to construct URLs for the REST resource endpoints. The payload consists of the resource representation, e.g. JSON. This handles incoming and outgoing publish operations and acts as a message broker with REST access to topics and, if there is storage, topic history storage. 

REST Message Broker allows message clients to publish to REST endpoints and subscribe to REST endpoints. An application can monitor an MQTT endpoint by observing the REST resource it publishes to, and an application can publish to an MQTT client by updating to the REST endpoint the MQTT endpoint is subscribed to. For example, sensors could connect with MQTT and publish updates for application software to read, and application software could update a REST endpoint, resulting in the system publishing the update to a sensor that is subscribed to the URL as topic.

The above example shows how an MQTT broker endpoint can be added to a REST server to enable REST clients and MQTT clients to share data by mapping URLs to topics. When either a REST client updates a resource an MQTT client publishes to a topic, the corresponding resource update is published to any subscribers. 

A General Event Model for REST APIs and architectures

In summary, a complete event model is presented for adding event driven real time capability to RESTful architectures. The event model enables RESTful abstractions for event sources and destinations, message broker endpoints, client and server endpoints, and asynchronous software event handlers. 

Through the Observer, Subscriber, and REST Message Broker abstractions, and associated graph resource definitions, a general facility is created that can abstract the functions of common event and message passing systems to provide high level REST API control of the low level protocols, for example QOS control for MQTT endpoints. These high level models provide a consistent API for software interoperability, while allowing diverse protocols to be used in the underlying platform.


  1. Have you also considered cases where it is not possible for every IoT node to be a server, but still want access over HTTP?

    For example, how can I observe an endpoint using a browser?
    Must I fallback to MQTT over websockets (or similar), or should servers provide support for long polled endpoints?

    (You refer to PUT, POST and CREATE. But, as I understand it, CREATE is not an HTTP method).

  2. How to push data to a client? That would be probably work using websockets and http. There could be some handler to update the display from the JSON or the Observable Property can be HTML.

    Long polling is what is done in CoAP with extended GET, right? Should we add this to HTTP GET?

    I think it would be nice to figure out a way to do this with datagrams personally.

    Yes, the basic operations are mapped to POST, PUT, GET, DELETE. So CREATE needs to be mapped to POST or PUT.

    For Observable Properties and REST resources in general, it seems to make more sense to map CREATE to PUT and UPDATE to POST, but CREATE is usually mapped to POST.

  3. Hi Michael,

    +1 for a simple, open approach based on HTTP and Web-hooks.

    If I understand this correctly, you have event sources that allow event sinks (or integrators at configuration time) to register Web-hooks (e.g. source = a physical button exposing a pressed event; sink = a light bulb consuming a value=on|off).

    When we experimented with a similar setup the next question was the (HTTP body) format of Web-hook calls. This is especially relevant if you want an open, decentralised system. Glue code in the cloud works fine (e.g. IFTTT, Zapier), but it would also be interesting to allow direct calls between source and sink. A pragmatic solution might be JSON, plus a simple template mechanism like Moustache so the source can fill values into the template, plus a convention how to discover available values. But that's already quite a lot to agree on. Or is there a simpler way to make this work?

    Kind regards,
    Thomas (@tamberg)

    PS. As far as I know MQTT defines even less semantics than HTTP so the same questions apply.

  4. Hi Thomas,

    Yes, we want to enable direct Webhook calls from source to sink. The data payload being passed could be the JSON Observable Property but could also be a link to an object.

    In the case of MQTT, there is an existing convention to use the URI as the topic and pass the JSON object as the payload, but since MQTT is binary we would also need to decide on a consistent encoding.

    In all of these, there are the layered questions of structure, representation, and encoding.

    In our Smart Object API, there is an RDF description that provides resource discovery and can specify the structure of objects, but there still needs to be a standard for general interoperability.

    Can the callback message body structure be standardized while allowing for different data object structures? Then, microformats, web formats, and RDF could variously be used to configure the interface. A template could be a generic type that can be read/written with a simple machine.

    1. The format of data, operations set and protocols those operations could be executed exist in multiple standards like SOAP. What is missing is extend-ability to support custom formats and protocols. Which IMO for IoT should be requirement along with predefined set of primitives. Another plain of protocols is support of "native" binary ones. As some formats already have binary presentation (binary XML for example), those are itching to be included into reference implementation.
      There are registries of external objects and their services definitions already in use(UDDI). Could this infrastructure be used efficiently for IoT? With some advances - yes.

  5. Michael, thanks for a great piece that lays out the various roles and functions. I wanted to call your attention to the webhook-based method for adding events to RESTful APIs that Sam Curren and I put up here: (with sample event generators and consumers). The goal of this effort is to provide a low-overhead way for low-resource endpoints to raise events in a way that would be familiar to most API developers.

    In addition, we have an implementation of that specification that we call Sky in the KRE rules engine, an open source event processing system.

  6. Hi Michael,
    Could you, please, add the google doc version of this article to comment on particular paragraph subjects?
    In here you have 3 different concepts touched(data model, event flow and communication protocols). Perhaps we could do the discussion on each item level. Or perhaps mail list/newsgroup?

  7. Good article! It makes sense to use event model only in those cases, when asynchronous calls are inevitable e.g. by a chat with websockets...


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.